Subject: [PlanetXUpdates] Planet X: Report by a
Wednesday, 2 June 2004 5:42
Subject: [planetx2003] Planet X From A Biblical* Perspective
Here's the scientific part. BTW if anyone is not
McCanney on a website discussing Planet X and is debunking all or
part of the data of its existence and imminent passage, there's a
good chance you've run into more gov't disinfo.
Chapter 1 ~ Scientific Support
A Scientist Warning About Planet X
James M. McCanney, on the subject of Planet X. I
had never heard of
him, but in listening I learned that he was a real scientist with real
credentials saying that Planet X was real and that NASA has been
aware of this for 30 years.
I studied McCanney's website and every radio show
interview by him
that I could find. I was happy to find that he provided answers for
all the questions and doubts I had concerning Planet X, which we
shall cover in this chapter. However, the goal of this chapter is not
to prove scientifically that Planet X is real, but only to explain
why NASA and others you would expect to warn you about it are not
doing so, and what evidence we do have for its existence from NASA
and other sources.
In fact, if you take the time to look there is a
lot of evidence
available which I will only briefly summarize here. I want to address
the main objections for believing in a Planet X threat and then move
on to the important things that Scripture says for dealing with that
threat which are not covered in other books.
Why is NASA Silent On PX?
NASA seems to be silent about Planet X. They
certainly are not warning
anyone to prepare for its passage. If you did not know any better you
would conclude from this alone that Planet X is a hoax. However, the
fact is that NASA was the first to announce the discovery of Planet
X, back in 1980s as reported in the June 19, 1982 edition of the New
York Times: Something out there beyond the furthest reaches of the
known solar system is tugging at Uranus and Neptune. A gravitational
force keeps perturbing the two giant planets, causing irregularities
in their orbits. The force suggests a presence far away and unseen, a
large object, the long-sought Planet X. Astronomers are so certain of
this planet's existence that they have already named it "Planet X -
the 10th Planet."
Apparently the announcement of the discovery was a
within a week they retracted it and have been publicly silent ever
since. Yet, there is sufficient evidence that they have had an
internal project tracking PX as this NASA internal document records:
NASA ADS Astronomy Abstract Service
· Find Similar Abstracts (with default settings
· Also-Read Articles
· Translate Abstract
Title: Search for planet X
Authors: Harrington, Robert S.
Affiliation: Naval Observatory, Washington, DC.
Journal: In NASA, Washington, Reports of Planetary Astronomy, 1991 p.
(SEE N92-12792 03-89)
Publication Date: 10/1991
NASA/STI Keywords: PERTURBATION, SKY SURVEYS (ASTRONOMY), SOLAR ORBITS,
SPACE OBSERVATIONS (FROM EARTH), NEPTUNE (PLANET), URANUS (PLANET)
Bibliographic Code: 1991plas.rept...53H
The observation of the region of the sky in which
it is believed
Planet X should now be, based on perturbations observed in the
motions of Uranus and Neptune, was determined, and there was no
reason to update that determination.
A limited area of that region was photographed,
and that will be
continued. A given area is photographed with the twin 20 cm
astrograph in New Zealand on two successive nights near the time that
area is in opposition, and these plates are blinked in Washington to
identify anything that has moved. The predicted region is in the
south, which requires observations from a southern station, and it is
in opposition in the Aprilm to June period, which means observations
have not yet started for the year.
If Planet X is really coming and NASA has been
watching it for years,
one would naturally want to know why they are not talking about it?
James McCanney has dealt closely with NASA during his career and can
explain why this is. He claims this is because NASA is under
congressional order not to tell anybody if they discover a doomsday
scenario coming"the same edict that restrains public officials from
telling the public of an impending disaster and causing a panic.
It has to go out through some official channel if
it goes out at all.
If this is true, then in light of NASA's demonstrated knowledge of
PX, its more frightening that they have been silent about it
than if they had continued to update the public since their initial
discovery! This indicates to me that they know its passing will not be
harmless like Comet Hale Bopp's was seven years ago (which follows a
similar orbit and is thought by McCanney to have been part of Planet
X's entourage at one time.)
Why Don't We See It?
If we accept that NASA knows about Planet X but
will not tell us
because of national security issues, what about the amateur
astronomers and institutions of other countries who are not
restricted in that way? Why are they not reporting Planet X? The
problem, according to McCanney, is that PX's lack of brightness and
position make it hard to see. Its current location makes it visible
only in the Spring, rather than all year round.
But even then you have to be on the right place on
earth because of
PX's skewed elliptical orbit. McCanney claims that it actually
approaches our solar system from below the ecliptic (plane of the
planets' orbits) meaning the best viewing is from the Southern
Hemisphere which is mostly water and less densely populated. McCanney
comments on this in writing about the above Harrington abstract:
In 1991 Robert S. Harrington, head of the Naval
Washington, D.C. wrote an internal Abstract which culminated over a
decade of theoretical and observational astronomy with a team of
experts. He was in charge of the NASA directed search for a large
planet at the edge of our solar system that had been perturbing the
orbits of the outer planets. Many previous attempts had been made,
all leading to incorrect results ... but this time Harrington was
certain that he had found the location of the large rogue planet.
What is interesting is 1) NASA for decades had
sponsored a search for
this object with the highest level staff members available, 2) it
was fully aware that something big was entering our solar system and
3) as you will see ... it seems that anyone associated with the
results has been silenced either by death or by fear. A shroud of
secrecy and deception surrounds this entire story.
Part of the discovery of Planet X was based on the
fact the outer
large planets Uranus and Neptune were being pulled DOWN in their
orbits. No other effect could cause such a change in the orbits of
these planets except the existence of a very large previously
undiscovered celestial object which had to exist down and in the
direction of the unexplainable motions of these outer giant planets.
Harrington knew that it had to be BIG and it had
down below the plane of the planets (the ecliptic). He also knew that
since it had not been there before that it must be a new body
entering the solar system.
Harrington wrote a brief abstract telling of his
final trip scheduled
to New Zealand in the Spring month of May to perform the blink
photographic session with a 20 cm astrograph (approximately 8"
aperture high precision camera). This seemed like what should be a
routine observation and so sure was Harrington of the location of
this object in the sky that he planned only two successive nights for
the two required photos. These would be returned to Washington to
determine the location and size of the new object.
An 8" camera in 1991 to 93 (the date that we
believe Harrington made
his final expedition ... NASA information is scarce) was not very
large so we are not talking about professional grade equipment ...
that is, this object was expected to be very large and Harrington
knew it would be only visible during the month of May from a very
southerly remote location on Earth. He chose New Zealand over the
rugged uncharted regions of Patagonia in South America.
So a big reason why PX is not obvious to the world
already is because
it is best viewed close to the South Pole ... where there are fewer
people and fewer observatories to find it. But even now as I write
this in April, McCanney reports another problem. There is much haze
in the atmosphere that makes viewing a diffuse, dim object like PX
hard to do unless you are looking directly at it from a 90 degree
angle (only possible from the South Pole itself). All this, in
conjunction with the science establishment's coverup gives PX the
conditions needed to sneak up on the majority of earth's
Even someone from NASA has admitted the
possibility of being
blindsided. David Morrison, Director of Space & Astrobiology at
NASA's Ames Research Center has spoken before Congress on the threat
of cosmic impacts. He writes: It is possible for a comet to 'sneak
up' on Earth, escaping detection until it is only a few weeks from
impact. A perpetual survey is required to detect long-period comets,
and even with such a survey we cannot be sure of success ... Comets
and Origin, P.254: But even if the general population without big
telescopes nor accessibility to the South Pole are not able to
observe PX, Russia appears to have become convinced PX is real and a
The following story was released on September
13th, 2000 by Andrei
Shukshin of Reuters news service. "Russia's Parliamentary leaders and
President Vladimir Putin agreed Wednesday to embark on a three-year
crash course to thwart what they said was an anticipated chain of
disasters due to hit the country in 2003. "(These are) issues of
extraordinary importance, strategic issues which may degenerate into
a serious threat for the existence,...I want to stress this .. for
the existence of Russia," former Prime Minister
Yevgeny Primakov told reporters
A group of scientists in Russia in the year 2000
meetings to discuss the inbound planet discovered from one of their
largest observatories. This led to the infamous "2003 Problem" which
the Reuters News Service wire reported on Sept. 13th 2000. The top
government officials of Russia called for a commission to study the
problem which was said to expect to cause "a string of calamities"
and "a massive population shrinkage." They openly wondered whether
Russia would still even exist as a country afterwards.
Why? Because most of the old Soviet Union is
fairly low-lying land,
and the polar ice caps will melt during these next 2 years causing
the new sea level to be around 700 feet above what it is now, and
most of the old Soviet Union, including much of Russia, will be under
Obviously the 2003 timing was inaccurate, but that has always been
considered only "the earliest timeframe" that PX could arrive, not a
date etched in stone.
What Evidence Is There?
In spite of NASA's coverup and difficulty of an
explains that there is quite a bit of evidence pointing to the
existence and near passage of Planet X. Perturbations in the orbits
of the planets: As early as the mid-1800s scientists noticed the
orbits of Neptune and Uranus not going exactly according to
theoretical expectations. These deviations could not be
explained by miscalculations in the masses of the planets, as the
direction of the deviations was downward according to McCanney.
Solar Weather: McCanney says, "We're seeing
the Sun at an excited
level never before seen. There was a solar maximum in the year 2000
that would be the expected time for the Sun to reach the maximum of
activity on its 11-year solar cycle, and after that it would be
expected to diminish in energy over that 11-year span of time. We
should be well on the way in the year 2003 to the solar minimum, but
instead, the Sun is at an explosive state never before seen in the
history of our solar system.
My theoretical work shows how, in fact, the Sun is
some large object that we have not seen yet -- NASA probably has seen
it, but it is not telling us -- causing the dramatic solar flares
that we're seeing."
Earth Weather: Earth weather has also been erratic
in recent years.
McCanney claims that this is directly a result of the increased solar
activity which drives earth's weather according to his proven
Many have been talking about increased earthquakes
since the 1990s.
Although I have not heard McCanney talk about this, one must wonder
what is causing this change. There is a cause for every effect. Could
it be Planet X causing this? We shall see later from Scripture that
great earthquakes will be associated with PX's passing.
Because McCanney had not made an observation of
Planet X, he refuses
to speculate on the timing of PX. But in his own words, due to the
scientific and historical evidence for Planet X, its passage is "not
a question of if...but when."
What Will Happen When It Passes?
The odds of Planet X hitting us are remote.
Unfortunately, an impact
is not necessary to cause major problems. Because of the gravity and
magnetism of PX it will be able to disrupt things on earth from a
distance, just as it is allegedly already doing to the solar system.
Here's what McCanney says:
The effects on the Earth are very clear, both from my theoretical
work and from what the ancients describe. There are episodes of
mountain building. There could be a pole shift caused by a
gravitational tidal wave that moves through the surface mantle of the
Earth. There would be flooding both from tidal waves of the oceans,
tremendous atmospheric storms and also from a huge pollution influx
of oil and water -- hydrocarbons and water -- from inner planetary
space onto Earth. And all of these things have been seen in the past.
The Bible talks about, for example, when all the
insects and snakes came out of the ground and overran the Earth. This
was a direct result of the electric fields penetrating the mantle of
the Earth and causing these creatures to leave the ground and come
out of the ground. The atmospheric conditions include the increase in
the number of volcanoes going off.
I want to mention that these planetary objects do
not have to come
necessarily that close to Earth to cause even dramatic Earth changes.
Electrical discharges can occur between the planets even a distance
apart. These, in fact, have been measured with NASA satellites where,
in the 1990s, we saw incredible electrical discharges flow between
Jupiter and Earth, taking out a number of our communication
The scientists at that time were totally puzzled
that outer space
could do this. They still don't understand the very electrical nature
of our solar system. My book explains, in fact, how this works in a
theoretical sense, and it also explains in a practical sense the
effects it would have on planet Earth.
Hopefully the reader can see from what little we
have covered of the
secular side of Planet X that it demands further consideration, if
not merely because it is a potential threat to your way of life.
However, when we hear about dangers like this, we have to be careful
to watch our reaction. Some choose to disbelieve and ignore things
that they do not want to accept because they are so horrible.
Sometimes we react to bad news not in disbelief of
its reality, but
in disbelief that we can do anything about it, also resulting in
complacency. But if you have read this far, you are one of the lucky
few to have heard about Planet X early enough to do something
to prepare for it. Do not waste that knowledge. Keep reading and find
out where Scripture talks about Planet X and what to do about it.
A good starting point is www.detailshere.com/bibleprophesy.htm
and see the extensive disaster preparedness section at www.detailshere.com/niburu.htm
and see www.prophecykeepers.com